From the beginning of time groups of privileged people have gathered to shape the social space or to create elements that occupy these spaces, these groups developed processes, knowledge and tools that have been mastered over time and preserved through the generations.
Within these groups can be seen a clear hierarchy and system of command where the great majority is dominated by an illuminated minority that at its work works for another minority even smaller and more powerful, the relation between product, production, is linked to the Needs of the powerful minorities who need oppressed majorities to develop products and be able to reproduce them massively to meet the needs of the social space.
On the other hand the work of art and the work of nature is differentiated by the advance preparation and the calculation, nevertheless they have a direct relation since the work of the artist is inspired by the work of the nature, at the same time this definition can Be subjective since depending on the viewpoint of the observer and his religious beliefs we could say that the work of nature is the maximum artistic expression developed by the architect of reality Almighty God.
Both definitions are valid according to the social group to which they are addressed, in these social groups we can see how powerful minorities make use of resources related to religion as means for mass control, these privileged groups use psychological mechanisms to manipulate the conditions of Life of the labour forces and be able to obtain the maximum benefit at the lowest cost, this relationship between powerful minorities and subjugated majorities are closely related to each other since one gives a reason to be to the other, in other words the majorities need minorities Of their guide and of their necessities of products, while the majorities lack the labour force in order to carry out their business plans.
Nature creates beings capable of imitating their creations and converting them into works of art, these works of art can be reproduced infinitely and become products of a production line created by workers and not by artists, in the time in which we find ourselves We can observe how gradually we enter a new stage of development we find ourselves at the doors of a new change of mentality, processes and tools, technological advancement is leading us to a new industrial revolution where the new work force are robots.
We could see this new work force as anti-nature, if we look at it in a pessimistic way we could say that humanity is self-annihilating through technological progress and that works of art and their human artists will be replaced by their robotic counterparts, However if we can see beyond the fear of modernization we will see that a new type of art and artist is emerging, we have to start from the point where behind a machine there is a human mind that created it and created it as a work of art, being an anthology also to religion with a creator and a creature capable of performing works of art, this new art is an art that comes from an intangible but real world, is the art of manipulating and distributing information packets in form Of electrical impulses in mechanized development environments, each line of code has been created and planned beforehand as part of a set of actions that generate reactions calculated with the highest precision
For architecture, the use of this new work force and these meta-tools means an increase in the quality of production, reduction of the cost and time of production and a better training and specialization of the human workers.
The development of new construction and design processes is necessary to adapt and solve problems, the correct training of workers is an advantage to be taken into account in the development of society since the idea is not to be replaced by robotic workers, Rather that human workers can access the correct education to control robotic tools, robots and artificial intelligence are not a substitute for humanity rather hyper-tool that must be used correctly, the problem is that many workers are not interested in learning more than they already know, and I am talking about those who deliberately and with all the possibilities open, do not want to improve their possibilities and knowledge, this happens since the system is designed for the working masses to get accustomed To being in an area of comfort that does not impose any challenge and provides a lifestyle that is flat and dedicated to consumerism without many possibilities for promotion but on an apparent superficial stability.
The rationality of space, according to this analysis is not the outcome of a quality or property of human action in general, or human labor as such, of ‘man’, or of social organization.
The production of space (Social Space) – Lefebvre
The infinite reproduction of products and their commercialization is a process that is implicit in the human being, can occur with or without the intervention of printed currency, the societies base their development in the development production and commercialization of products and services destined to satisfy the necessities Of all social classes but especially of the upper classes, in the field of architecture one of the points that most strikes me is how construction companies use different strategies to reduce construction, lengthen the process and maximize the Benefit, these are the mediators key points where control with respect to production and product is blurred resulting in a product of questionable quality in the same way is questionable the ideology of these groups, social space contains a diversity of objects Which must be reorganized in time and space, the social force that reorganizes and distributes these products is about to be optimized, updated and equipped with ultra precision tools to decentralize the power of mediators and achieve a more responsible and safe development.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.