Conclusion

I would like to analyse one of the concepts that were repeatedly reiterated in the classroom, this concept is to be heroes, an individualistic idea that without a deeper definition could help to maintain a concept that possibly does not fit modern times, it is possible That heroism is reserved only for a few with access to privileged positions, while others have to settle for the situation in which they are and sell their ideals for a superficially stable life, mainly I would like to define the meaning of hero: admired For their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.

This definition could fit many people as it is very superficial and if I can contribute something to this definition would be the concept of saving lives, therefore I could classify as a hero a doctor however a soldier seems to me a public servant licensed to take lives, and depending on which side you are a soldier could be the enemy, almost the opposite of the definition of hero I seek, can be an architect a hero or is a public servant? architects have in their hands the ability to save many lives and indeed architects can be heroes, the problem arises when you promote heroism the way it is proposed in The Fountainhead, a classic hero who needs no one and is all powerful.

We have to be aware of our limits and remember that the union make us strongest, a multitude of heroes and heroines are much better than a single super egocentric man, I am sure Patrik Schumacher thinks he is a hero of the modern age, And it is that same type of heroism adulterated by vainglory which I would like to banish as a concept, and bring a reality where human beings with ideals trained by culture and education meet to gather strength in the for the benefit of society since we must protect the weakest.

A clear example of these classic heroes of our time are the politicians heads of state, public officials, they could be true heroes, they could work for the people and improve their lives, but on the contrary they work to improve the lives of the privileged classes while they generate profits for their own pockets, they go out on the television, they run a circus among them, they show an excellent control of the irony, they think they are movie stars, or worse they think they are the direct representatives of God in the world, it is incredible that the methods of control of population from the middle age continue to be valid, it is through the union of heroes that the road to social liberation can be wrought, I do not want to be confused with Marxist ideas, since Marxism seeks the union of the masses and one thing that is clear is that the masses lack personality are easily manipulated by union leaders and other puppeteers, it is not at all a group of heroes seeking change, individuals with firm ideals and Noble qualities.

As I could understand through the reading the individuals go through tests, they are tempted, they can fall, they get up and start again, they can succeed or they can be classified as equal but we all know the truth and this is that we are conditioned by who we are and from where we come from, tell me about it since i was 13 years old I have the mark of the immigrant in my face, I like facing the reality as it is, I do not like to sweetener it, nor to tell me lies, social classes exist and I am at the last step of the ladder, dreaming about being a hero could seem too much for me, I should only be satisfied with what someone with power can offer me and try to live a life without pain or glory, however for the place and in the situation in which I am right now at 9,239 km Away from my home, being a hero is my only option.

I did enjoy reading all of them, the lectures helped me to understand that everything is governed by universal laws that affect us all and that we can make use of those same laws to change our reality and society for a common benefit and not only of the privileged classes, THE PRODUCTION OF SPACE was the one that gave me the most trouble reading it.